Skip to content

Historic Judicial Review to Challenge Law on Assisted Suicide (2 October 2008)

DEBBIE PURDY JUDICIAL REVIEW ? 2nd & 3rd OCTOBER

Historic Judicial Review to Challenge Law on Assisted Suicide

“I just want clarity” says Debbie Purdy as she challenges law on assisted suicide

A landmark review of the law on assisted suicide takes place on 2nd and 3rd October at the High Court as Debbie Purdy asks the Director of Public Prosecutions to clarify the law on assisted suicide.
Ms Purdy, 45, who suffers from Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis, is challenging the law which could leave her husband open to imprisonment if he helps her to end her life in a foreign country where assisted suicide is legal.

She would like the option of travelling to Switzerland to receive medical help to end her life should her suffering become unbearable. But the law in England and Wales states that assisting a suicide is punishable by up to 14 years imprisonment and there is no law in the UK to allow her to have an assisted death. If her husband is liable for prosecution Ms Purdy would have to travel abroad alone, and would have to contemplate going while she is healthy enough to do so, but before she is ready to die.

Almost 100 British citizens have been faced with no alternative but to travel abroad to die. To date, no one has been prosecuted for accompanying a loved one abroad to end their life.

Debbie Purdy said:

“I just want clarity so I know whether or not my husband Omar will be prosecuted or questioned by the police if I decide to travel abroad to die and he accompanies me. There are a great many people like me who want to choose how they die if life becomes unbearable and the law as it stands is unclear.

“I want to know what the law considers to be assisting a suicide, is Omar open to prosecution if he helps me to into a taxi to the airport, or books my flights?”

If the law is clarified and Omar is not liable for prosecution, Ms Purdy can delay any decision to travel abroad to die. If he is liable for prosecution, it may result in her travelling abroad to die before she is ready.

Ms. Purdy said:

“I enjoy my life and the people around me, and I don’t want to die until my condition becomes unbearable. If the law is not clarified, I may be forced to travel abroad alone before I am ready. But if I know that my husband will not be prosecuted for accompanying me to Dignitas, I will be able to wait until I’m ready to go because I can rely on his help.”

Sarah Wootton, Chief Executive of campaign group Dignity in Dying which is supporting Debbie Purdy’s case said:

“This case is about choice. Debbie should have the option to die at a time of her choosing should she feel her suffering has become unbearable. Debbie’s case highlights the desperate dilemma that some terminally ill people are faced with at the end of their lives under the current legal system. Not only do we need clarity for those going abroad to die, but we need a change in the law here. Providing terminally ill adults with the option of an assisted death, within strict legal safeguards, would protect vulnerable people and give them dignity and choice at their end of their lives.”

Debbie is represented by David Pannick QC and Ms. Saimo Chahal.

Ends.

For more information, interviews with Debbie Purdy or Dignity in Dying Chief Executive Sarah Wootton, and details of previous cases similar to Debbie’s, please contact Melissa Milner on 020 7793 4035 / 07976 636 228 / melissa@dhacommunications.co.uk or Daniel Harris on 020 7793 4038 / daniel@dhacommunications.co.uk

Further information:

The Judicial Review will take place on Thursday 2nd and Friday 3rd October 2008 at the Royal Courts of Justice, London. The result is expected 1 to 3 weeks after the Review

The current law:

Debbie Purdy:

Dignity in Dying:

Dignitas: